Definition of armed conflict given by appeals chamber of the international criminal tribunal10/3/2023 In sum, if the International Tribunal were not validly constituted, it would lack the legitimate power to decide in time or space or over any person or subject-matter. In international law, every tribunal is a self-contained system (unless otherwise provided). International law, because it lacks a centralized structure, does not provide for an integrated judicial system operating an orderly division of labour among a number of tribunals, where certain aspects or components of jurisdiction as a power could be centralized or vested in one of them but not the others. A narrow concept of jurisdiction may, perhaps, be warranted in a national context but not in international law. UNLAWFUL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL A. HEREBY DENIES the relief sought by the Defence in its Motion on the Jurisdiction of the Tribunal.”. “THE TRIAL CHAMBER HEREBY DISMISSES the motion insofar as it relates to primacy jurisdiction and subject-matter jurisdiction under Articles 2, 3 and 5 and otherwise decides it to be incompetent insofar as it challenges the establishment of the International Tribunal The judgement under appeal denied the relief sought by Appellant in its essential provisions, it reads as follows: wrongful primacy of the International Tribunal over national courts Ĭ. illegal foundation of the International Tribunal ī. Before the Trial Chamber, Appellant had launched a three-pronged attack:Ī. By that judgement, Appellant’s motion challenging the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal was denied.Ģ. The Appeals Chamber is seized of an appeal lodged by Appellant the Defence against a judgement rendered by the Trial Chamber II on 10 August 1995.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |